troubled diva  
 

All over Web 2.0 like a rash: flickr · last.fm · twitter · badj.it · myspace · muxtape
Fingers in other pies: post of the week · shaggy blog stories · village community blog

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Mike's fantasy Glastonbury (updated).

Oh, is it Glasto time already? Although I know that I'll never go, this doesn't stop me daydreaming about what it might be like. And so, having studied the detailed line-up for this year's festival, I've put together a fantasy timetable for the weekend. Come, let us tramp together through the dappled fields of Avalon...

Working assumptions:

1. That I can magically teleport from one part of the festival site to another, landing in the perfect spot in front of each stage.

2. That at the end of each evening, I can magically teleport from the festival site to a recherché little boutique hotel, complete with Egyptian cotton sheets and chi-chi little bottles of body wash in the bathroom. Because I simply don't DO canvas, or whatever state of the art micro-fibres they make tents out of these days.

3. That all published timetables are rigorously adhered to by the festival organisers, with no time delay between each act.

4. That all food and toilet breaks are deemed totally unecessary, and that energy levels remain in peak condition throughout the day. (No, that's NOT code for an unlimited supply of top-of-the-range Fair Trade narcotics. High on the music, me.)

Friday.

11:30-12:20: The Ralfe Band (The Park Stage).

A rousing yet gentle start to the festival, in which a suitably Glasto-esque Celtic/folk feel is mixed with elements of country and blues, and a degree of Bad Seeds/Kurt Weill theatricality. They promised much 18 months ago, and I'd like to see how they've developed.

12:20 - 13:00: Fear Of Music (John Peel Stage).

A friend in The Biz tipped this lot for greatness over two years ago, but I've heard little since then. As his other tips have since come to fruition, I'd like to see whether his faith was justified.

13:20 - 14:20: Los Campesinos! (The Park Stage).

So great when I saw them in March, and the future classic "You! Me! Dancing!" could be the weekend's first Glasto Anfum.

14:20 - 15:10: Gogol Bordello (Pyramid Stage).

Although unconvinced by their recorded work, I'm banking on them coming into their own in a live setting. Also, I'm quite liking the way that each successive act is faster and noisier than the one before. Don't want to peak too soon, though...

15:10 - 16:40: Amy Winehouse (Pyramid Stage).

Time to give both my teleporter and my boogie shoes a rest, as we stay at the Pyramid Stage for one of a growing number of acts who give me moderate pleasure on record, but a massive thrill in a live setting. Just as long as she stays off the sauce, of course.

16:50 - 17:15: Super Furry Animals (Other Stage).

I'm just going to catch the first twenty-five minutes, before zooming off elsewhere. The SFA's and I have drifted apart over recent years, but they used to be a stunning live act. Maybe they still are...

17:15 - 18:10: Julie Fowlis (Acoustic Stage).

...but the Outer Hebrides are calling, and I must away. Always a bit of an unreconstructed old folkie, K is currently big on the award-winning Julie, who hails from North Uist and sings in Socttish Gaelic. Honestly, this is great stuff. But even so, I'm going to bail out before the end, for...

18:10 - 19:25: The Hold Steady (John Peel Stage).

OK, so I'll be seeing them in August, at the Summer Sundae festival in Leicester. But I can't be expected to wait that long. Worth it just for the anthemic "Stuck Between Stations" alone. The acceptable face of Uncut magazine Americana.

19:25 - 19:45: Martha Wainwright (The Park Stage).

Just a quick 20 minute blast of Martha, before I get to tackle one of the biggest dilemmas of the weekend. How COULD they put the next two acts on simultaneously? How COULD they? Only one thing for it: see 'em both. So let's start with...

19:45 - 20:30: Toumani Diabate's Symmetric Orchestra (JazzWorld Stage).

The Malian kora maestro, cooking up a storm with his dance band, may well prove impossible to tear myself away from... but I have to be there for...

20:30 - 21:20: Rufus Wainwright (Other Stage).

Rufus's 2005 Nottingham show ranks among the very best that I have ever seen, and his new album is sublime. Bit of a no-brainer, really.

21:20 - 23:05: Arcade Fire (Other Stage).

Look, just HOW fantastic is the Friday night Glasto line-up? This is just getting ridiculous. The Arcade Fire are playing Nottingham Arena in October, and I can. Not. Wait.

At this point, the dilemma becomes almost intolerable. The Arctic Monkeys at the Pyramid Stage, for a collective moment of generation-defining mass communion? The suddenly-interesting-again Bjork at the Other Stage? Nope. I'm going to split the Friday night climax in two, heading first for the second half of...

23:05 - 23:40: The Aliens (The Park Stage).

Formed from the ashes of The Beta Band, another act who never quite captured their staggering live show on record. I'm still kicking myself for missing them in Nottingham a couple of weeks ago - but Beyoncé was in town that night, and what's a boy supposed to do?

Just twenty minutes left to curfew, which gives enough time for a small taster of...

23:40 - 00:00: Hot Chip (John Peel Stage).

...before the lure of the Egyptian cotton lures me away. After that lot, the rest of the weekend can only be an anti-climax, surely?

Saturday.

12:15 - 13:30: The Pipettes (Pyramid Stage)
13:40 - 14:40: The Long Blondes (Other Stage)

Two reasonable starters, before we hit a very rough patch indeed. Guillemots? Once was enough, thanks. Dirty Pretty Things? Biffy Clyro? Dear me, no. So I'm zooming forward to:

15:50 - 17:00: CSS (Other Stage)
17:00 - 17:30: Klaxons (Other Stage)
17:30 - 18:35: K'Naan (JazzWorld Stage)
18:35 - 19:55: Mr Hudson & the Library (JazzWorld Stage)
20:00 - 21:30: Maximo Park (Other Stage)
21:30 - 22:00: Patrick Wolf (John Peel Stage)
22:00 - 23:10: Get Cape Wear Cape Fly (John Peel Stage)

And again, another rough patch. Our illustrious Saturday night headliners include The Killers, The Twang, The Waterboys, The Saw Doctors, Mr Scruff and Sasha. Not a chance. Iggy & The Stooges might be diverting, but I'm playing it safe with:

23:15 - 00:00: Rodrigo Y Gabriela (JazzWorld Stage)

Sunday

14:30 - 15:15: Koop (JazzWorld Stage)
I've got an old album of theirs. Tasteful jazz-house. It's quite nice.

15:15 - 15:45: The Horrors (John Peel Stage)
For the social anthropology more than the music.

15:45 - 16:10: Seth Lakeman (JazzWorld Stage)
16:10 - 16:40: Get Cape Wear Cape Fly (Other Stage)

A second veiwing of the Capester, who strikes me as an ideal Glastonbury act.

16:45 - 17:10: Young Knives (John Peel Stage)
17:10 - 18:40: Tinariwen (JazzWorld Stage)

(with occasional teleportations to Dame Shirley Bassey on the Pyramid stage, just to see what's going on)

18:40 - 20:00: Beirut (JazzWorld Stage)

(with occasional teleportations to Mika on the Other stage, just to check that I haven't been wrong about him for the past few months)

20:00 - 21:00: The Go! Team (Other Stage)
21:00 - 21:25: Just Jack (John Peel Stage)
21:25 - 22:40: Bellowhead (Avalon Stage)
22:40 - 00:00: Chemical Brothers (Other Stage)

Labels:

· link to this ·

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Miles better than that bloody Myspace...

It doesn't quite seem de rigeur in polite blogging circles to link to one's profile page, so perhaps I shall refrain - but blimey, Facebook's a bit addictive once you get stuck in, isn't it?

Although it doesn't afford you the same degree of design flexibility that you get on Myspace, where Facebook scores highly is with all the little add-ons that you can integrate into your profile page. Hours of fun, if you have hours to kill.

Anyhow, since I shan't be linking to the fruits of my labours, here's a re-posting of my current Hot Question on Facebook.

If you could own one work of art, regardless of cost or security issues, which would you choose?

My answer: Something that I could live with, that wouldn't overwhelm me and throw everything else off balance. So, a nice Barbara Hepworth for the garden then.

And you? Hmm?

· link to this ·

Interview: Vince Clarke of Erasure

A shorter version of this interview originally appeared in the Nottingham Evening Post. Here's a longer transcript of our conversation, which took place back in April.

Erasure at the Hammersmith Apollo, March 2005

Speaking from his Stateside home in Portland, Maine, Vince Clarke talked about Erasure’s new album, their forthcoming tour plans, and the reasons for their longevity.

The title of the album – Light at the End of the World – sounds both apocalyptic and optimistic. What were you conveying with that?


“I think it’s optimism. Most of the tracks are upbeat, and that’s the general vibe of how we wanted the record to sound.”

Did you have a pre-planned intention for the album, or did its themes naturally emerge during the recording?

“The themes just naturally happened. We wrote the songs initially in Portland, Maine. Andy Bell came over to the US for a while, and we demoed the songs on guitar. Then we rented a house in town and built a studio. Usually I’ll go to the UK, but because I’ve got a little baby and everything, we decided to have the producer come over here. As the producer and I worked on the tracks, Andy would start formulating the lyrics, and it just built that way.

Does the songwriting process always involve the two of you working physically together in room, or are things ever arranged remotely?

“We always have to start the song together. We’ll sometimes do the production apart, and he’ll sing the lyrics in a separate studio. But this time round, we did the whole thing together. We wrote the songs together, and we were in the studio at the same time while the music was being produced. He would sing vocals in the evening, and we’d do it that way.”

Andy’s lyrics can sometimes be enigmatic, but you generally get the feeling that they’re based on real events in his personal life. Do you ever ask him for further clarification, or are you happy to let the enigma stand?

“I usually get what he’s saying anyway. On this record in particular, his lyrics were much more personal. He and I share everything that’s going on in our lives anyway, so I can tune into what he’s trying to say.”

This feels like your most uptempo set in a long time – especially the opening three tracks, which are all highly danceable. It reminds me of the start of the last Madonna album, as a real statement of intent. I heard that you were suffering from a “mid-tempo crisis”...

“That’s definitely true. As we got older and older, our songs got slower and slower. So we made a concerted effort to write more dancey tunes this time.”

But you’re a married family man now. When was the last time you went out and shook your hips in a club?

(Laughter) “Ooh, I can’t remember! 1979, I think! Andy still goes to clubs and stuff, but those days are over for me.”

What about remixes? Are you going to be looking for dance remixers to get involved, maybe with [the current single] Sunday Girl?

“Yeah, we definitely want to get some good remixes done. We have a guy that looks after us in the States, and he’s really interesting in getting a kind of US angle on them. So we’re looking at various people from over here to maybe contribute.”

You’ve always done well in the Billboard dance charts, so I guess some of the tracks might be showing up there.

“Yeah, hopefully.”

You’ve been together as a working partnership for 22 years, which is roughly half your lives, and longer than many marriages. What is it that keeps you together, and have there been any moments when a divorce has looked imminent?

“We don’t clash at all. We haven’t argued in 22 years. Andy’s a really easy-going guy, and I think his easy-going nature has rubbed off on me as well.”

“The other secret is that we don’t get precious about our own ideas. If he comes to me with a lyric and I say “Well, I don’t know”, or if I come to him with a tune and he’s not 100% behind it, then the song just gets dropped, and we move on. If we’re not both fully committed to the tune, then inevitably it won’t sound very good.”

Yourselves and the Pet Shop Boys – and arguably Depeche Mode, funnily enough – are the last of the Eighties synth-pop acts who are still regularly releasing new material. What is it that has enabled you to remain viable for so long, while most of your contemporaries have fallen by the wayside?

“We’ve had a fantastic fanbase: people who have stayed with us throughout our existence. We did a lot of touring early on, and people have just stuck with us.”

“We also have a very loyal record company. The guy that runs the company [Daniel Miller of Mute Records] is a fan. I don’t think we would have survived if we had been signed to a major label.”

Even though they have major label backing now, Mute Records still retains the identity of a quirky, leftfield, arty, independent label – and I wondered whether a large part of your longevity was down to that support. If you have an album which maybe doesn’t do as well as the previous ones, they’re cool with it.

“Absolutely – and Mute really is a one man operation, as well. So it’s not like we have to build up a relationship with a new A&R person every time we release a new record.”

Since your commercial peak in the early Nineties, you still register very consistently sales-wise. Indeed, every UK single since Sometimes has gone Top Thirty, which is quite a hell of an achievement. It means that you’ve never become a nostalgia act.

(Deadpan) “Only to ourselves.”

Because you’ve never dramatically altered your sound, it’s like you exist in a separate musical universe all of your own. Do you feel any musical kinship with other acts?

“I don’t know. You talk about nostalgia; well, I’m nostalgic for music that came from the Eighties. It’s not that we’ve set out to have a particular identity; what we’ve really tried to do is write electronic music around good songs. For us, the most important part of a record has always been the tune. I guess that gives us a particular identity.”

You’re touring the UK in the autumn, but before that you’re taking part in a summer package tour in the US called True Colors, which features quite an interesting line-up of acts. Can you explain something about the concept of the tour?

“It was an idea that was put forward by our US agent, about a year and a half ago. He wanted an event that was almost like a family day out, with lots of bands. He asked us to take part, and it just felt like an interesting thing to do. It will hopefully be playing to an audience that haven’t necessarily seen us or heard of us. It’s not just old codgers like ourselves there; there are a couple of young bands as well, so it won’t be like a geriatrics’ convention.”

Who else is on the tour with you? Rufus Wainwright sticks in my mind...

“I think he’s doing a few guest appearances. There’s Blondie, and Cyndi Lauper will be headlining. Then there’s various different bands playing on different nights – about five or six every night. Everybody plays a 45 minute set, and it will be larger venues than we usually play.”

With Blondie being on the tour, you could wheel out your cover version of Rapture, for comparative purposes...

“Well, she’d be chuffed about that. Not!” (Laughter)

Any thoughts, at this early stage, on what we might expect from your autumn tour of the UK?

“Once we’ve done the True Colors tour, we’ll be touring the US in our own right. I’m not sure what Andy is cooking up for that side of the tour, but I assume that whatever happens here is going to be transferred to the UK. I’m sure there’ll be costumes involved! (Laughter) It will be all electronic, all-singing and all-dancing, and lots of... clothes.”

Which songs do you never tire of playing on stage, and are there any old hits which you’ve quietly dropped?

“There’s lots we’ve dropped – but the song I enjoy playing the most is A Little Respect. Everyone seems to know all the lyrics. Last time we performed it, which was in London, the audience sang the whole song before we’d even started it. It was amazing; really, really moving.”

When you’re on stage, how faithful do you like to be to the original versions? Do you like messing around with old favourites?

“I change from tour to tour. Sometimes I radically change the sound, almost doing a complete remix of the track; at other times it’s very true to the album. It really depends on the day. The technology’s changing all the time as well, so that often changes the sound.”

When it comes to contemporary music, do you still follow the charts? Do you still try to keep up with everything?

“Well, no. Now I’ve got a child, the only music I listen to is The Wiggles.”

Do you ever hear other singers and feel tempted to work with them, or is it a pure monogamous loyalty to Andy?

“It is a monogamous loyalty. I do work on other stuff, though. I do bits and pieces with Martyn Ware [Heaven 17] sometimes, on various projects. Not making pop records, but making music for exhibitions and stuff. I just did some music for a cartoon here in the States. So, little bits and pieces – but not actually working with another singer and making an album, no.”

Career-wise, perhaps you’ve already done it all – but are there any musical ambitions left to achieve?

“Yes. To appear on Sesame Street. That would be brilliant, wouldn’t it?”

The accompanying photo was taken by Bifford The Youngest, and has been reproduced under a Creative Commons non-commercial attribution license.

Labels: , , ,

· link to this ·

Cocorosie – Nottingham Trent University, Wednesday June 13.

This article originally appeared in the Nottingham Evening Post.

Cocorosie in Liège, June 3rd 2007

Watching Cocorosie casually shambling around the stage, sharing private jokes and either unwilling or unable to concentrate on their performance, we seemed in danger of having all our worst preconceptions about the self-consciously arty avant garde confirmed. Led by sisters Bianca and Sierra Casady, and backed by a keyboardist, bassist and human beat-boxer, the band’s hip-hop influenced “freak-folk” sound was dominated by the sort of squeaky Björk-on-helium vocals that could have become intensely grating.

As the set progressed, these eccentricities became steadily less troublesome. Slowly but surely, the performers settled into their roles. Predominantly song-based, the material was never allowed to drift into the sort of aimless meanderings that make the likes of Joanna Newsom such a struggle.

With their radical re-working of Akon’s I Wanna Love You, sung from the stripper’s perspective (“You see me trying to smile up on this pole, just hiding the pain that’s deep in my soul”), everything snapped into focus, the remaining material displaying a new sense of purpose and cohesion. This no longer felt like smug experimentalism for its own sake. What could have been one of the year’s most insufferably pretentious gigs instead turned out to be one of the most spell-binding and magical.

The accompanying photo was taken by sndrspk, and has been reproduced under a Creative Commons attribution license.

Labels: , ,

· link to this ·

From the gossip columns...



· link to this ·